View Single Post
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 03-20-2008, 08:54 AM
jIM_Ohio's Avatar
jIM_Ohio jIM_Ohio is offline
$ Saving Post Graduate
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Milford, OH
Posts: 2,871
Points: 14802.63
Donate
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by project15 View Post
I would think the 2nd house in that dual 15-yr situation because chances are that I would upgrade at that 15 year mark since I would have a huge down payment and probably make more.

If it's just one 15 year fixed vs. one 30 year fixed, the 15 year would have the most value at the end of the 30 years because I'm paying less overall on it but it's still worth a similar amount as the 30 year fixed.

Bad phrasing.

15 yr fixed and 30 yr fixed houses have the same VALUE because you are comparing the same house.

30 yr fixed had a higher interest payment and higher cost.

If you are analyzing costs, 15 yr fixed wins
If you are analyzing net worth, 30 yr fixed/ invest the difference wins without much competition.
If you are analyzing rates of return, the 30 yr fixed wins without much competition.
__________________
Light travels faster than sound. That is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.

One person's stupidity is another person's job security.

I give investment advice and financial advice. Nothing I do or don't do replaces the poster researching and double checking what I suggest. The poster taking my advice is responsible for their own actions.

http://jim.savingadvice.com/
Reply With Quote