View Single Post
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 03-19-2008, 02:38 AM
trex trex is offline
$ Saving Fourth Grader
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 34
Points: 240.00
Donate
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by disneysteve View Post
That's a whole different discussion. I'm speaking strictly about calories vs. price. My point being that for the same price, you can get a meal with fewer calories or a meal with more calories. A 300 calorie Coke is a lot worse than a zero calorie bottle of water.
Maybe you should read this:

How the feds make bad-for-you food cheaper than healthful fare | By Tom Philpott | Grist | Main Dish | 22 Feb 2006

Quote:
Why do low-income people tend to exhibit more diet-related health problems? Adam Drewnowski, professor of epidemiology at the University of Washington, posits a simple answer: people are gaining weight and getting sick because unhealthy food is cheaper than healthy food -- thanks in large part to federal policies...

From a short-term economic viewpoint, the Ding Dongs present a better deal: 360 calories per dollar, and no need for the time or skill to cook. "If you're on a limited income trying to feed a family, in a sense you're behaving rationally by choosing heavily sweetened and fat-laden foods," Drewnowski says.
__________________
Not politically correct, but I tell it like I see it

Last edited by trex : 03-19-2008 at 02:41 AM.
Reply With Quote