[Scanner]

Wow, I searched some articles and see I am not the first one to face this ethical dilemma, esp. people living in apts.

FIrst of all, I did know this - you can encrypt your connection or have an Open connection. I am encrypted at my work because I have patient data there. Encryption seems fairly easy and straightforward, a little more complicated than a password, but not quite rocket science.

So, it kinda begs - if the neighbors were that concerned about lower bandwidth, you would think they would simply encrypt their network. But. . .in ethics, you can't always assume - can I assume this extra bandwidth is waste?

Second of all, if you choose to leave your network "open", rather than encrypting it, is that a de facto invitation, kinda like having a concert in your backyard and having neighbors watch The Moody Blues perform? Probably not.

Third of all, I did not know this - WiFI can interfere with tranmissions in your house, so much so, you have a right to complain if your neighbor has a problem. So, is wireless internet kinda like "radio" in that I have a right to access it if I can receive it?

Some states say no but the Feds are more in the middle.

I think the best way is to ask for permission - is it okay I get on your wireless if I have my laptop in the house? But I'll keep the ISP connection anyway, I wouldn't feel comfortable using wireless for online purchases, which we probably make 10-20 per year with credit card numbers and such. I also access bank statements and so forth.