<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Car Insurance - New Satellite Sites</title>
	<link>http://www.savingadvice.com/blog/2006/09/08/10822_car-insurance-new-satellite-sites.html</link>
	<description>Bridging the gap between saving money and investing</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: pfadvice</title>
		<link>http://www.savingadvice.com/blog/2006/09/08/10822_car-insurance-new-satellite-sites.html#comment-5497</link>
		<dc:creator>pfadvice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 00:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savingadvice.com/blog/2006/09/08/10822_car-insurance-new-satellite-sites.html#comment-5497</guid>
		<description>Yes, the main benefit of the two sites would be text link ad revenue as fivecentnickel pointed out. Car and car loan sites do quite a bit of advertising so I don't think it would be too difficult to find advertisers for the sites, but I would ultimately like to have all the information consolidated onto a single site. 

I think I'll see how they develop since it will take some time to get all the information up there. That should also give me a clue at the worth of the site depending on how much revenue they are able to generate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the main benefit of the two sites would be text link ad revenue as fivecentnickel pointed out. Car and car loan sites do quite a bit of advertising so I don&#8217;t think it would be too difficult to find advertisers for the sites, but I would ultimately like to have all the information consolidated onto a single site. </p>
<p>I think I&#8217;ll see how they develop since it will take some time to get all the information up there. That should also give me a clue at the worth of the site depending on how much revenue they are able to generate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fivecentnickel.com</title>
		<link>http://www.savingadvice.com/blog/2006/09/08/10822_car-insurance-new-satellite-sites.html#comment-5495</link>
		<dc:creator>fivecentnickel.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 21:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savingadvice.com/blog/2006/09/08/10822_car-insurance-new-satellite-sites.html#comment-5495</guid>
		<description>Foodie: You could sell twice as many text links if you had two sites.

Jeff: You might think about building them both up for the time being, but in the future you could always onsolidate your content at one site and sell the other domain name (it'll have PageRank and be out of the sandbox at that point).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Foodie: You could sell twice as many text links if you had two sites.</p>
<p>Jeff: You might think about building them both up for the time being, but in the future you could always onsolidate your content at one site and sell the other domain name (it&#8217;ll have PageRank and be out of the sandbox at that point).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foodie Universe</title>
		<link>http://www.savingadvice.com/blog/2006/09/08/10822_car-insurance-new-satellite-sites.html#comment-5494</link>
		<dc:creator>Foodie Universe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 21:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savingadvice.com/blog/2006/09/08/10822_car-insurance-new-satellite-sites.html#comment-5494</guid>
		<description>What would be the benefit of having two sites instead of just one? Do you think it would give you more overall traffic and therefore more ad revenue?

And you are right.  Having one domain point to the other won't help you with traffic. I've tried it.  The secondary domains got no traffic whatsoever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would be the benefit of having two sites instead of just one? Do you think it would give you more overall traffic and therefore more ad revenue?</p>
<p>And you are right.  Having one domain point to the other won&#8217;t help you with traffic. I&#8217;ve tried it.  The secondary domains got no traffic whatsoever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pfadvice</title>
		<link>http://www.savingadvice.com/blog/2006/09/08/10822_car-insurance-new-satellite-sites.html#comment-5487</link>
		<dc:creator>pfadvice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 05:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savingadvice.com/blog/2006/09/08/10822_car-insurance-new-satellite-sites.html#comment-5487</guid>
		<description>I considered doing this, but auto insurance domains are truly hard to find. I don't think that pointing it would generate any traffic at all - it's not a term that people would likely enter into a search engine. Since it was so hard to find them, I'm not willing to just dump the name either. Thus having to decide among the choices above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I considered doing this, but auto insurance domains are truly hard to find. I don&#8217;t think that pointing it would generate any traffic at all - it&#8217;s not a term that people would likely enter into a search engine. Since it was so hard to find them, I&#8217;m not willing to just dump the name either. Thus having to decide among the choices above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: poundwise</title>
		<link>http://www.savingadvice.com/blog/2006/09/08/10822_car-insurance-new-satellite-sites.html#comment-5484</link>
		<dc:creator>poundwise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 01:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savingadvice.com/blog/2006/09/08/10822_car-insurance-new-satellite-sites.html#comment-5484</guid>
		<description>Why not develop one, say Crossover Auto Insurance, but keep the other domain as well, pointing it to the first?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not develop one, say Crossover Auto Insurance, but keep the other domain as well, pointing it to the first?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
